Log in

No account? Create an account
"Like a graveyard...
... people dig me"
9th-Apr-2004 08:06 pm
Sex is not a subset of poking. They are disjoint sets, satisfying different drives. That is all, have a nice day.
9th-Apr-2004 07:39 pm (UTC) - It is a subset of poking
You are wrong, and Kitri, Charlene and I are right.
10th-Apr-2004 11:01 am (UTC) - I would like to bring your attention to this thread, in which I am right and you are not
9th-Apr-2004 08:05 pm (UTC)
this just reminded me: you still owe me money for all those bets you lost. bucko.
10th-Apr-2004 06:50 am (UTC)
sex is a subset of poking. its a type of poking, and its higher priority of pokingness
10th-Apr-2004 08:55 am (UTC) - (The only valid use of ad hominim)
Seeing as how none of the people who disagree with me have penises, I would have to say that you have no basis for the statements you are making.
11th-Apr-2004 11:30 am (UTC)
I totally agree.
11th-Apr-2004 01:26 pm (UTC)
Thank gods a girl agrees with me. All these women, and their not-having-penises, fully misunderstandanding the relationship between poking and sex!
This page was loaded Oct 16th 2019, 3:40 pm GMT.